CO129-627-4 Argyle Street explosion- correspondence on claims and enquiries 1-6-1946 - 31-7-1951 — Page 12

the explosion, by what right do those whone naghignes bad to the berouter reek to place

asfonsibility flam question

on someone the. That is the

Jusa It.?

Ha ha have

12

15/10/49

Japore Ital in semilar carcumstances we should adopt the

same line as is proposed to Hay Kary, for way

Cass

avising in halaya.

Lu

The care dealt with in 5232

4j.

5232549.

2110

Th. Kinkness

>

Then will ) a pe. Apt., disposing I

imama w.o.

argument -vy, whore in pares

3

1 (4)?

Popes shred sa circin, fay,

a mouth o The Kickass & kup part in parais

of my minute 7 3079

andia review

ایسا

23/10

vefor

I think

LM

shred

any

23/10

wo are

night

in

Draft hl.

saying they

not normally responsible

for disposing of explosives, even in this country (except as agents of Govt

(u)

this is

the point

55342/48-49 b/w,

accepted liability

how wor

an a

made to HK in

whole)

after which HK

shd. perhaps br

carfuriens of presing Defence

express parn! 2 of the dft; of presions Defense Daft. interent

&

I pass thringt in Edwards

5 to wo

14

Diremus

26/20

31 OCT 1949